|
|
|
After showing the PowerPoint
presentation, you may choose to share Rabbi Jeremy Rosen’s reflections on
Chanukah. More about Rabbi Rosen is
available at www.jeremyrosen.com
|
|
Since my youth the color and
the flavor of Anglo and, indeed, World Jewry has changed. I was brought up in
a world in which the vast majority of Jews desperately longed to be accepted
by the non-Jews, and as a result relegated their Jewishness to the margins of
their lives. If we were to go back two thousand one hundred and sixty-eight
years ago, to the time of Antiochus IV and the Maccabee Revolt, we would find
a similar situation. Babylon was sort of the New York of those days, where
most Jews resided. Others were resident in the major commercial and political
centers of their world, Alexandria, Rome, and as Far East as India. So the
Jews were a multifaceted, multicultural collection even then. But still, in
those days, you identified with a country and a culture, which were
essentially religious, even though the degree of one’s commitment would vary,
of course.
|
|
|
|
In Britain Jewish education
was, apart from small pockets, virtually non-existent. Besides, the World
Wars had disrupted the Jewish lives of two generations and the upheavals in
Western Europe had resulted in a generation of Jewish cultural orphans. The surprising
thing was the determination of the few not to give up. Britain was unusual in
that the community was notoriously philistine and uninterested in culture.
Such as there was seemed to exist almost entirely thanks to the continuing
immigration from Vienna and the Mittle European cultural centers. Within the
Jewish community cultural Judaism hardly existed at all. France was
different. It had a strong secular Jewish tradition, which it still has, as
do Belgium and the United States, and, of course, Israel. I guess thanks to
these external influences Britain, too, is beginning to see a rise in secular
culture as an expression of Jewish identity.
|
|
Alexander the Great had
introduced the idea of an intellectual culture that could span different
continents and different religious traditions. The culture of Greece created
the first pan-cultural tradition, and Judaism ended up borrowing its
technological and systematic innovations while rejecting its rationalism and
materialism. (For example, the idea of schools was adopted from the
Greeks.)
|
|
|
|
In the Land of Israel the
Jews had been allowed by Alexander to continue their own religious
traditions, so long as they were loyal to the overriding political authority
of the Empire. The High Priest was the titular head of the Jews. What was
once a religious appointment now became a political one. Rival families of
priests bribed or plotted their way to power by playing off the rival powers
who succeeded Alexander and had carved up his Empire and then battled each
other for supremacy in the Land of Israel (which found itself caught between
the Ptolemies of Egypt and the Seleucids of Syria). The priests formed a
party called the Sadducees after the dominant priestly family of Tzadok
(Sadducee is the Greek equivalent of the Hebrew Tzadokim). Most of the
priests and the merchant classes were wealthy and very pro-Greece. They soon
adopted its culture and more. The priests actually introduced the theatre,
circus and games into Jerusalem itself.
|
|
|
|
The poor peasants were, in
the main, supporters of the rabbis who became known as the Pharisees
(literally, the Rebels). They tended to be more nationalistic and resistant
to external influences. The two parties were rivals for power and fought each
other with varying degrees of bitterness and violence over the next two
hundred years. There were a few priests who sided with the rabbis against
their own majority, and for a lot of the time the two sides accommodated each
other over Temple ceremonies.
|
|
|
|
But the fact was that the
vast majority of the Jewish population were well on the road to assimilation
into the new exciting Greek world and would have soon disappeared had
Antiochus IV not made the fatal mistake, in 168 BCE, of listening to the
advice of some assimilating Jews. They suggested he force the rabbis out of
existence by banning them, so he had his representatives in Israel set about
trying to ban Jewish worship and customs outside of the Temple and then
making the Temple itself the center of Greek affairs.
|
|
|
|
We Jews are a funny lot.
Left to our own devices we readily abandon our traditions, but let anyone try
pushing us around and we get rebellious!
|
|
|
|
A small group of pious men
decided it was time to fight back. Had the few religious fanatics,
fundamentalists, call them what you like, not taken it upon themselves to
resist the lure of a free, liberal, self-indulgent world, we would have
probably disappeared. And yet the victory was not at all clear-cut. There
were a series of guerilla wins. But internal politics kept the main forces in
Damascus. Yes Judah re-took the Temple and re-dedicated it but a Syrian
garrison remained in Jerusalem and when Judah had to confront a serious
Syrian army at Bet Zur, he was killed, his brothers fled and once again it
was only politics that got Jerusalem back, not force of arms.
|
|
|
|
Chanukah is the story of
religious conviction, even if unfashionable, resisting and preserving itself.
Cultural identification was leading to a dead Jewish end. Important and
valuable as cultural Judaism was/ is, what ultimately differentiates us is
our religious tradition. How interesting, then, that the modern Israeli games
modeled on the Greeks should call itself the Maccabia, when the Maccabee
revolution was initially against everything cultural that Greece stood for.
Later on the Maccabees themselves, assimilated and felt more Roman than
Jewish--which is why the Talmud doesn’t mention them at all! That was also
why the rabbis ensured that the primary message of Chanukah would not be
military victory but spiritual survival.
|
|
|
|
The moral of all of this
Chanukah tells us that without a deep commitment to a Jewish religious way of
life, we are doomed. Fundamentalism that does not accommodate itself to
technological advance (while preserving its integrity) cannot survive as a
vibrant option instead of a fossil. You can only afford to indulge in other
cultures if you are deeply rooted and well educated in your own. Otherwise the dominant one is sure to
prevail.
|
|
|