The large attrition rate among new teachers led over thirty states in America to mandate the implementation of mentoring programs for beginning teachers. This method traditionally provides a new teacher with support from an experienced veteran as part of an induction process into a particular educational setting or into the field in general. It has been assumed that mentoring support for new teachers helps to successfully integrate them into their new roles and significantly reduces attrition. Yet, many academics and practitioners question whether current mentoring programs have sufficiently well articulated goals and, if so, whether the programs are appropriately constructed to maximally achieve those goals. A number of experts believe that, in general, mentoring in education has failed to realize its full potential, not only as a tool for induction, but also as a methodology for supervision of instruction. In recent years, researchers have begun to study the impact of mentoring and to formulate guidelines and practices designed to enhance the effectiveness of the mentoring process.
Obstacles to Success Researchers have identified a number of factors that impede the development of successful mentoring programs in education: 1) Mentoring runs counter to the culture in most schools. Teachers tend to work autonomously in the privacy of their own classrooms. Most teachers have little experience with the activities that are central to mentoring – peer observation and cooperative reflective analysis. Teachers tend to resent intrusion into their domains, and hesitate to enter into the “private domains” of others. 2) School culture tends to discourage distinctions between teachers. The tendency to treat teachers as equals runs contrary to the concept of mentoring. 3) Ongoing changes in teaching philosophy and methodology bring into question whether mentor – protégé relationships actually serve to improve the effectiveness of beginning teachers. Some studies have shown that mentoring promotes conventional norms and practices, and therefore limits progressive change. 4) Limited scope and budgetary constraints tend to limit the support provided for mentoring programs. Release time needed for classroom observation and reflective discussion is not provided. Furthermore, mentors are often not given the training needed to gain an understanding of the role of the mentor and the skills required for effective implementation. As a result, mentoring efforts are often reduced to “big brother – big sister” style orientation programs.
Components of Effective Mentoring Programs
A. Goals – A mentoring program to be maximally effective must have clear goals. Barry Sweeny (Strengthening the Impact of Teacher Mentoring on Student Learning, 1999) identified 5 different levels on which mentoring programs might function, each reflecting progressively more sophisticated objectives:
The inclusion of the higher levels of mentoring objectives produces a number of positive results:
B. Support – Mentoring programs will only succeed if they receive the proper support from the school lay and professional administration, including:
A. Assessment vs. Mentoring – Ideally, mentoring should be conducted exclusive of assessment. Mentors who are not involved in assessment must maintain confidentiality in order to earn the trust of the protégé. It is important for administrators to respect that confidentiality. Administrators who are involved directly in mentoring must walk the fine line between coaching and evaluation. The creation of a reflective learning environment reduces the tension between mentoring and assessment.
B. Mentor – Protégé Matching– An important element in the success of the mentoring process is the relationship between the mentor and the protégé. Some experts believe that the success of mentoring depends largely on the match between the mentor and the protégé and they place great emphasis on that aspect. Others feel it is more important to focus on the creation of optimal conditions for mentoring rather than on the relationship, which is highly unpredictable.
Mentoring in the Jewish Educational Setting
Mentoring has not been well developed within the Jewish day schools. This is an issue that deserves attention in general. Mentoring has specific application, as well, in the employment of shlichim from Israel. In recent years, the use of shlichim has diminished in American day schools, largely as a result of difficult situations in which teachers failed to integrate well into the school. However, the current personnel crisis in Jewish day schools has produced a renewed interest in shlichut. The integration of shlichim is particularly difficult because, although they have teaching experience, they are entering a culture that is much different from the educational culture from which they come. In order to maximize the success of shlichut and to take advantage of the pool of teachers that are available in Israel, Jewish day schools should consider the development of mentoring programs designed specifically for shlichim.