Re: Hazak vs. Kaved in the Eseret Hamakot
Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Hazak vs. Kaved in the Eseret Hamakot

March 15, 1999 05:00AM
<HTML>1. The Book of the Dead is a non-royal text which didn't achieve final
form until the 7th cent. BCE. Although the protestations of innocence,
not confession, in chapter 25 relate to many moral crimes, there is no
evidence that the treatment of (foreign) slaves was included.
2. Would the Philistines be influenced by Egyptian religion (1 Sam.6:6)?
3. "Moses" in Egyptian means "son of", like Thutmoses. (Does Paroah's
daughter know Hebrew?) "kaved lev" is a Hebrew idiom, not an Egyptian
cognate.
At the same time, permit me to applaud your ingenuity. Textual
commentary is not a precise science. Peshat usually comes down to the
question of which explanation is most plausible. I could be (and often
am) wrong!</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

Hazak vs. Kaved in the Eseret Hamakot

Etan Tokayer with Mark Smilow February 25, 1999 05:00AM

Re: Hazak vs. Kaved in the Eseret Hamakot

Rabbi Zvi Grumet March 01, 1999 05:00AM

Re: Hazak vs. Kaved in the Eseret Hamakot

Rabbi Avner Taler March 03, 1999 05:00AM

Re: Hazak vs. Kaved in the Eseret Hamakot

Jeremiah Unterman March 04, 1999 05:00AM

Re: Hazak vs. Kaved in the Eseret Hamakot

Shmuel Afek March 06, 1999 05:00AM

Re: Hazak vs. Kaved in the Eseret Hamakot

Rabbi Zvi Grumet March 09, 1999 05:00AM

Re: Hazak vs. Kaved in the Eseret Hamakot

Avi Shmidman March 09, 1999 05:00AM

Re: Hazak vs. Kaved in the Eseret Hamakot

Jeremiah Unterman March 09, 1999 05:00AM

Re: Hazak vs. Kaved in the Eseret Hamakot

Jeremiah Unterman March 10, 1999 05:00AM

Re: Hazak vs. Kaved in the Eseret Hamakot

Shmuel Afek March 11, 1999 05:00AM

Re: Hazak vs. Kaved in the Eseret Hamakot

Jeremiah Unterman March 15, 1999 05:00AM



Author:

Your Email:


Subject:


banner class does not have character N defined in its font.