<HTML>"One could take this approach a bit further: she sinned in private by
uncovering her body, so she is shamed in public in a similar manner."
I would suggest that this is not midda kneged midda.
'She' may not be guilty of '...in private...', on the contrary - she
could be innocent of the physical act; rather her sin is that she
conducted herself in public in such a manner as to generate the suspicion
of what she may have done in private.
Thus it is this public behaviour for which the humiliation of the Sotah
process is midda knegged midda.
Regards,
Warren Braham, London</HTML>