A Look Back and A Look Ahead at Megillah Reading. Who? How? And Why?

by | Apr 4, 2019 | Blog, Discussions | 3 comments

Many Talmudic debates result in practical Halacha, and guidance for everyday living for observant Jews. Society has evolved from generation to generation, but every few decades our brilliant ​Poskim find ways to make living a life of Halacha and observance that much more accessible. Often times when debating a specific topic, we get caught in the crosswinds of Hashkafa, and how it relates to ​our particular circles, neighborhoods, or institutions. I find these debates particularly challenging in a school environment, where Hashkafa is hard to enforce, we cater to a range of families/communities, and our role as educators can be unclear.

With Purim just behind us, we have almost a full year to think about and plan for what Purim can and should mean for our students and school communities.

So many commentators write about why the Megillah was named only after Esther and not ​Megillat Mordechai V’Esther? Our sages teach us that “he wrote the Megillah” but only once Esther sends it out publicly, do the people accept and spread the story. Initially, the Jews were afraid to circulate the story because of how the nations of the world would react. It was due to the courage of Esther, who shared that the story was already recorded in the books of Media and Persia, that the people had no need to fear further consequences. Esther’s voice is what led to the Megillah being heard then and read today within our communities.

I think about this every year as we prepare for Purim.

The Talmud records in two places a woman’s role in reading the Megillah. In ​Masechet Arachin(2b – 3a) “All are fit to read the Megillah, to include what? To include women” and it references what was also written in ​Masechet Megillah(4a) “R’ Yehoshua ben Levi said women are obligated in the reading of the Megillah, for they too were involved in that miracle”. This sets off a debate amongst many Poskim, the answer to which is largely dependent on your ​minhagimand community.

In his works ​Chazon Ovadia Purim (נט), R’ Ovadia Yosef writes:


ויישוב קטן שאין שם איש שיודע לקרוא את המגילה כהלכה, ויש שם אשה שיודעת לקרות המגילה, יכולים להתאסף באחד הבתים והאשה תעמוד בצד בצניעות, ותקרא להם בטעמיה.

A small community that does not have a man who is able to read the Megillah properly (Halachically) and there is a woman who knows how to read the Megillah properly, they may gather in one of the homes and the woman will stand on one side modestly, and she may read the Megillah (with cantillation).


R’ Ovadia is not the first to generate this ruling, but he is the most contemporary. ​Rashi, Rif, Rambam, and​ Ritva are some who also agree that a woman may fulfill this obligation, all while following the well-known principle that whoever is obligated to do a mitzvah can fulfill the obligation of all those who are obligated to do that mitzvah (based on ​Mishna Rosh Hashana 3:8).

Every year when we celebrate Purim, we give credit to one of the main heroes of the story, but yet we are not willing to get behind some serious ​Poskim, and make it mainstream to have women lead the reading of public readings of the Megillah. I think this message can be harmful for the growth of the young women in our schools. I think it would bring more meaning to many young girls to know that the mitzvah of reading the Megillah can be fulfilled by a woman.

I recall hearing a shiur by R’ Ovadia’s son, R’ Yitzchak Yosef, who said that his father’s “wish was to edit many parts of his works (which were printed 30 plus years ago) and add to them more modern rulings.” He said that his father in his last few years acknowledged that this generation needs “many more leniencies”, and that following “stringent ​halachicviews” is causing many people to be minimally involved with Judaism.

If we do not accept the rulings where our Rabbis allowed leniencies, we will be forced to deal with the future ramifications of stronger leniencies. Rabbinic legislation allows and encourages tremendous flexibility when we are בשעת הדחק. I would like to argue that we move forward in a dignified way relying on multiple ​Poskim or we will inevitably get there in a pressing way.





Join the discussion below.

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Herschel Grossman
Herschel Grossman
3 years ago

Perhaps I am missing something, but in the citation from R Ovadia Yosef that is posted here, he writes: ‘ in a small community where no man knows how to read the Megilla’. In the plain English of this translation, this means that where a man IS present to read, a woman may not read. How is this cited then to support women’s reading? Perhaps you can explain.

Rabbi H. Grossman
Jerusalem, Israel

Aharon Assaraf
Aharon Assaraf
Reply to  Herschel Grossman
3 years ago

It’s meant to say, if we have room to give Leniency, then make it permissible as well. Also, if you look into the teshuva, the ruling was given so as to not “embarrass” the man, which is covered up by saying “kavod hatzibur”. When a lenient opinion is given, one must wonder why can this only work under the described circumstances.

Heshy Grossman
Heshy Grossman
Reply to  Aharon Assaraf
3 years ago

There is no reason for any wonder here, because the ruling is very straightforward, and not as you present it. This is a simple restatement of the Halacha which is well-documented in Shulchan Aruch OC 689. It rests upon the Talmud’s discussion, as explained by the rishonim, and Rav Ovadya adds nothing new or original, and certainly nothing upon which to build a revolution. Cited as a reference in Rav Ovadya’s sefer – in the footnotes – is the Aruch HaShulchan (loc. cit), who presents a second reason why women should best not read the Megilla for even one man,… Read more »

Want to think through something with your colleagues across the globe?

Check out the more than


posts in the LookJED archive.