Jewish Education Amidst Rising Antisemitism  volume 22:2 Winter 2024

Forty Ways to Learn Navi

by | Jan 22, 2026 | Personalizing and Differentiating Jewish Studies | 0 comments

One of the most powerful sources of professional reflection for me has always been hevruta—the back-and-forth of honest, challenging dialogue. Several years ago, a teacher with whom I shared a classroom told me that my teaching was “too frontal” and that I needed to give students more “voice and choice.”

Being naturally competitive and reflective, I took the critique to heart. During winter break, I spent two solid days redesigning my Navi curriculum for my sixth graders. My goal was simple: to create a system where students could take genuine ownership of their learning while still meeting our academic expectations.

First, I mapped out the essential chapters and verses I wanted students to master. Then, I brainstormed and collected 40 possible ways for students to demonstrate understanding—from writing their own tests, to designing artifacts, to composing eulogies for biblical figures. I narrowed the list to 22 activities that balanced creativity, depth, and appropriateness for the content we would be learning. Each student could choose freely, but no activity could be repeated. I also developed a detailed rubric so both students and I could assess progress clearly. Students learned through the material either in hevruta or on their own. They would begin with the text in Hebrew and would occasionally use the translation to check their understanding. I would circulate and discuss what they were learning as well as offer suggestions, guidance, and corrections.

The results exceeded my expectations. Students were energized by the variety and autonomy. I could circulate through the room, engaging in meaningful one-on-one conversations rather than managing the entire class from the front. More importantly, students began to see themselves as responsible for their own learning. Together, we used the rubric to reflect on their work, identify areas for growth, and make intentional choices about next steps. My original goal had been to accomplish all 13 of the mini-units, but I quickly realized that students moved at different paces. I encouraged students not to spend more than two weeks on a particular unit.

One student chose to create artifacts that became part of a museum exhibit showing important components from the life of Samson. It included samples of his hair, a donkey’s jawbone, part of a pillar, and more. Another student created a children’s coloring book that told the story of Purim, which was distributed in our early childhood program, and a third student wrote a eulogy for Sisera. Students appreciated having choice and being able to flex their creativity.

Gratz College Master's Degree in Antisemitism Studies

One student in particular stands out not for the project but for the discussion we had and the thoughtful decision that came from it. As we reviewed his project, he realized that a few adjustments could raise his grade slightly—but that reaching a perfect score would require redoing the entire project. After thinking it through, he decided he was proud of his “good version” and preferred to move forward. That moment of self-awareness—choosing reflection over perfection—was far more valuable than any score on a test.

The experiment was not without flaws. My timeline was too open-ended; some students completed 7 of the 13 units, most finished 11, and only one managed all 13. Perfectionists lingered over minor details while others rushed ahead. Some projects were completed quickly and others took much longer. Still, the learning was deeper, the ownership stronger, and the engagement undeniable.

Most strikingly, students remembered what they learned. Years later, as these same students prepared to graduate high school, many recalled details from their Navi projects with vivid clarity. Their learning had become personal—and therefore, lasting. 

Furthermore, I had built strong relationships with this class since I had an opportunity to meet with them individually and guide them. Five years later, as they prepared for graduation, students would still speak excitedly about the projects they chose to build in that class! They felt that they not only owned the project, they owned the material and were able to talk about it confidently and with authority. “I still remember the projects that we did in sixth grade with you,” a former student told me. “The stories from the Navi came flooding back to me as we toured Israel with our Tanakhs.”

Ultimately, I discovered three essential truths about differentiation:

  1. Choice breeds ownership. Students take pride in their work when they feel agency.
  2. Transparency builds trust. Clear rubrics turn grading into a shared conversation rather than a judgment.
  3. Individualization nurtures growth. When each student’s path is different, competition fades, and authentic learning flourishes.

By giving students choice, clarity, and confidence, I found that they grew not only intellectually, but also emotionally and spiritually. That, I believe, is the true promise of Jewish education: helping every learner find their voice in the sacred conversation of Jewish learning.

Gratz College Master's Degree in Antisemitism Studies
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Avi Greene is the Director of Curriculum and Instruction at Scheck Hillel Community School and brings thirty years of experience in Jewish day school education. Rabbi Dr. Green holds degrees in Judaic studies from Brandeis University as well as rabbinic ordination and a doctorate in education from Yeshiva University. Rabbi Greene is passionate about curriculum design, teacher development, and meaningful student learning.

From The Editor: Winter 2026

From The Editor: Winter 2026

For many years I believed that I was a good educator. Students, alumni, and parents told me so. I was mostly effective at exciting my students to learn, drawing them in, and teaching them content and skills they remembered for a long time. Students thought that I was fair and sensitive and really committed to their success. Hey, I even learned how to admit my mistakes and learn from them.

And then I got married and started raising children.

From Scaffolding to Independence

From Scaffolding to Independence

I run a progressive N-8 Jewish day school (Luria Academy of Brooklyn) committed to inclusion of children with a broad range of abilities and needs and backgrounds. One of the questions I get asked frequently by parents is when we are going to build a high school. Truthfully, it’s not currently part of our plan and we are blessed to be in New York City where Jewish high school options abound. What prompts the parental requests for a high school is their very reasonable concern for how their child will transition from our student-centered, individualized, supportive classroom to a more traditional, less flexible environment.

What Mainstream Schools Can Learn From a School Like Mine

What Mainstream Schools Can Learn From a School Like Mine

I recently had a conversation with a faculty member at a school of education which is part of a local university. He teaches a course titled “Learning and Cognition” and finds himself under pressure from students every year not to teach it. The students, as they enter the classroom, understandably want practical tools, and do not see the connection between how people learn and what they do in a classroom.

Choice in the Middle School Beit Midrash

Choice in the Middle School Beit Midrash

In a small Jewish day school, differentiation is a fact of life. Some of our students have diagnoses which explain why they have challenges in learning and some do not; some need lots of repetition of material in order to synthesize ideas and others seem to understand and be prepared to explain the content the first time they read or hear an idea. In our small community, some are able to thrive in a Hebrew immersion class while others begin to shut down in this environment. A typical curricular model in middle schools at small Jewish day schools is to offer grade-specific Jewish studies courses; this has the advantage of all students being exposed to the same content, and building upon past learning is an easier task. At Oakland Hebrew Day School (Oakland, CA), a K-8 school, we, too, had this model until ten years ago, when we found ourselves grappling with the following issues:

Traditional Text Study for neurodivergent Students

Traditional Text Study for neurodivergent Students

During our time in school together, Jewish studies classes were streamed based purely on Hebrew language skills. This approach, with its exclusive focus on Hebrew facility, prevented us—and we suspect many other neurodivergent students—from accessing and engaging in the depth and richness of Jewish texts and traditions. Furthermore, by focusing solely on translation and basic comprehension, it denied us the opportunity to apply our own strengths of analytical and creative thinking, which are often reserved for advanced streams.

Trauma Awareness In Jewish Day Schools

Trauma Awareness In Jewish Day Schools

A painful reality for Jewish educators is that, despite our most valiant efforts, a significant population of young people who go through the Jewish day school system feels distanced and removed from their education, as if they are perpetually outsiders to their community. Who are these young people? What causes this sense of distance? What can we do to help them? While every case is different, often these children are dealing with some sort of trauma that educators are not always equipped to support, and sometimes can inadvertently inflict. However, proper awareness and appropriate responses can go a long way in helping these young people feel welcome and understood.

The Unique Opportunities for  Personalization in Jewish Studies

The Unique Opportunities for Personalization in Jewish Studies

My experience at Jewish summer camp played an important role in forging my identity, first as a Jew, and then as a Jewish educator. When I made the jump from Director of Education at the camp I grew up at to the Jewish day school classroom, I would often reflect on what made camp so impactful and how I could bring aspects of experiential education into the formal classroom. I soon realized that it is not just about what camp has that the classroom does not, it’s just as much about the aspects of formal education that camps are unburdened by.

Differentiated Instruction in the Judaic Studies Classroom

Differentiated Instruction in the Judaic Studies Classroom

Judaic studies is a high-stakes undertaking for teachers who aspire to cultivate in their students not only deep knowledge of texts and traditions that shape Jewish identity, but also a personal relationship with the Torah and with God. Either of those objectives without the other misses an opportunity to foster in children a love of their heritage and the desire to keep it vital in their lives.

Making Tefilah More Student-Centered

Making Tefilah More Student-Centered

Every student enters tefilah with a different story. Some find comfort in familiar words and melodies; others feel unsure, disconnected, or skeptical. Yet tefilah in schools often assumes uniformity—everyone doing the same thing, in the same way, at the same pace. When we shift our focus to the people in the room, new possibilities for meaning can open up.

Differentiation, Relationships, and Planning with an AI Partner

Differentiation, Relationships, and Planning with an AI Partner

Jewish Studies teachers have long known the importance of meeting students’ individual needs, yet differentiation in practice has remained elusive. Judaic Studies teachers often lack ready-made resources or formal training in differentiation models. In this article, we share our experience using AI to help Jewish studies teachers overcome those challenges.

Blended and Personalized Learning in Jewish Studies

Blended and Personalized Learning in Jewish Studies

Blended and Personalized Learning (BPL) has become a valuable approach for Jewish studies classrooms seeking to meet wide-ranging student needs without overwhelming teachers. BPL provides structures that allow educators to teach more precisely, differentiate more naturally, and build student independence and choice. When implemented with clear routines, consistent expectations, and thoughtful planning, BPL transforms classrooms into dynamic spaces where learners move at an appropriate pace, engage more deeply, and take increasing ownership of their learning. Educators also benefit from having a mentor/coach guide them through the different steps. The following overview outlines the core principles of effective BPL and illustrates how these principles come to life in real 1st–8th grade classrooms.

Hevruta as a Tool for Differentiation and Personalization

Hevruta as a Tool for Differentiation and Personalization

Meeting the needs of every learner in the room is one of the most complex tasks a teacher faces. No two students process text in the same way. Some absorb information quickly, while others need more time. Some think visually, others verbally. Some feel confident sharing ideas in front of the class, while others shut down the moment they feel unsure. Even highly motivated learners approach Torah with very different strengths and needs. Teachers want to support every student, yet it is difficult to personalize instruction when the class is moving through the same pasuk or section of Gemara at the same pace.

From Teaching the Class to Teaching Each Student: Building Sustainable Inclusive Classrooms

From Teaching the Class to Teaching Each Student: Building Sustainable Inclusive Classrooms

Walk down the hallways of many schools today or step into a teacher’s lounge, and the shift in conversation is unmistakable. Instead of talking about plans for a trip, Shabbat, or the newest and most exciting curriculum, the conversation frequently has shifted towards struggling students, classroom behaviors, and the plight of supporting an ever-growing diverse Jewish student population. These discussions reflect a new reality: Teaching at a Jewish day school now requires an expanding skill set to meet the evolving needs of students and the growing challenges teachers face.

Differentiating Jewish Education – Not If But How

Differentiating Jewish Education – Not If But How

In the early 1970s, my mother sat in her 9th grade halakha class cowering in fear. Her teacher loudly berated the class as not one student volunteered to translate the words of the Rosh Hashana prayers. Her pulse racing, my mother suddenly realized she had an advantage. As the daughter of Holocaust survivors who came from two different countries, my mother’s first language was Yiddish and the mahzor she had pulled from her parents’ bookshelf the night before was a Hebrew-Yiddish one. She timidly raised her hand, provided the translation, thus saving her class from incurring further wrath from the teacher. Jewish education is unique in that each student brings their own personalized version of Judaism with them into the classroom. For my mother that day, it looked like a mahzor with a Yiddish translation.

Caring For Our Students & Ourselves In The Face Of Antisemitism

Reach 10,000 Jewish educational professionals. Advertise in the upcoming issue of Jewish Educational Leadership.

Caring For Our Students & Ourselves In The Face Of Antisemitism

Do you want to write for Jewish Educational Leadership? See the Call for Papers for the upcoming issue.

Secret Link